Skip to content
§ 01 — The Problem

We reconstruct the AI record, so you can make the recovery decision.

The capital has been committed. The forecasts have met operating reality. Now the organization must reconstruct what it acquired, what it spent, what value was produced, and what evidence remains.

AI Capital Recovery addresses the workout phase—not the promise.

§ 01.a — THE EVIDENCE PROBLEM

The AI portfolio may not exist as a defensible record.

AI investment data is distributed across procurement, finance, information technology, cloud platforms, business units, legal teams, vendors, and individual employees.

No single system may hold a reconciled account.

CONTRACT
In procurement
COMPUTE COST
In the cloud account
IMPLEMENTATION LABOR
Distributed across departments
PROMISED RETURN
In a business case or presentation
CORRECTION WORK
Unmeasured or undocumented
CONTINUED FUNDING
Without clearly recorded decision ownership

Until the evidence is normalized, management cannot determine what the company acquired, what it spent, what produced value, what remains exposed, or what requires recovery action.

§ 01.b — DEFINING THE ASSET

What was actually bought?

The first recovery problem may be defining the asset itself.

Companies may not merely discover that an AI investment produced less value than expected. They may discover that they cannot establish precisely what the organization acquired.

A
A license
Access governed by contracts, usage limits, data terms, renewal obligations, and vendor-controlled service conditions.
B
Access to a changing model
A service whose underlying models, configurations, policies, and behavior may change over time.
C
A semantic layer
Enterprise information retrieved through permissions, indexes, connectors, search systems, and user context.
D
A continuously updated service
A system whose configuration and behavior at an earlier decision point may no longer be reproducible.
E
A productivity capability
Value produced partly through employee judgment, review, correction, and institutional knowledge.
F
An interaction history
Prompts, responses, referenced information, user context, and downstream use that may be incomplete, expired, or unavailable.

In banking resolution, the note, collateral, payment record, borrower, lien, and servicing history could eventually be located—even when the file was disorganized.

With enterprise AI, the asset file may never have existed.

§ 01.c — THE DELIVERABLE
§ 01.c — THE DELIVERABLE

What reconstruction produces

The deliverable is a Recovery File: a standardized, reconciled account of AI assets, expenditures, outcomes, dependencies, evidence quality, and decision ownership.

The Recovery File provides the evidentiary basis for evaluating:

  • continued investment;
  • remediation;
  • contract restructuring;
  • replacement;
  • impairment analysis;
  • wind-down;
  • sale or repurposing;
  • defensible disposition.

Recovery is not a promise.

It is what a reconstructed record makes defensible.

See how the Recovery File is reconstructed
§ 01 — The core principle
AI does not become an asset because it was purchased, deployed, or described as transformational.

Its value must be evidenced.

Where evidence is incomplete, reconstruction comes before recovery.