§ 06 — Insights · Tag
ROI & Capital Loss
4 articles filed under ROI & Capital Loss.
- § 01The Slopification Crash: How Rushed Deployment and Usage-Based Pricing Broke the Numerator and the DenominatorMIT says 95 percent of generative AI initiatives returned nothing. Deloitte says only 10 percent of organizations saw significant returns on agentic AI. The crash was not a model failure. It was a governance failure, compounded by consumption pricing, over a portfolio no one kept records on.July 28, 2026 · 9 min
- § 02Shadow AI Spend: The Cloud, License, and Labor Costs No One ReconciledApproved AI initiatives are only the visible fraction of enterprise AI expenditure. The unallocated portion — cloud, seat licenses, embedded features, and human rework — often exceeds it.July 14, 2026 · 6 min
- § 03Anatomy of a Failed Enterprise AI Rollout: Five Recurring Failure ModesKlarna, McDonald's, Air Canada, Zillow, and IBM Watson Health each produced high-visibility AI reversals. The individual stories differ. The evidentiary gap they share is the same.July 10, 2026 · 8 min
- § 04The $30–40 Billion ROI Gap: Why Enterprise AI Spend Isn't Producing ReturnsRoughly $30–40 billion has been committed to enterprise generative AI. Independent research finds that 95 percent of the pilots show no measurable impact on the P&L. The gap is not a technology problem. It is a reconciliation problem.July 8, 2026 · 7 min
Browse other tags